The Fairness of Fees
September 9, 2009
I’ve been struck by fees over the past month of traveling and think it’s worthwhile to make a few comments about the pesky things. Fees can be effective facilitator of increased profits. But they can also drive customers to increase switching and higher price sensitivity if not used carefully. There is a balance between excessive fees and fair ones that pricing professionals and marketers need to be aware of.
Last year, we moved our business and personal banking accounts to a local bank due to two things. I started the move when the big bank we were working with started charging me a fee for a monthly wire transfer. The was just $15 but I kept a big balance in my accounts and was a good customer. It just didn’t seem fair. I knew that it didn’t cost them anywhere near that much to handle the transaction (it’s all electronic anyway). I met with the branch Assistant Manager and he said that he couldn’t waive the charge. I knew that wasn’t true. We were also getting lousy service on our business account so we moved all accounts to a local bank where we are dealing with a VP Branch Manager who had been in the position for quite a few years. We now get great service and no extra fees.
What’s the message? Fees can cause loyal customers to switch when they are perceived as not being reasonable. What is reasonable? Security fees on airline tickets are reasonable because of all that security we see at the airport these days. Plus, all the airlines charge the fee. Fuel surcharges when gas prices are high are reasonable but they’re not when the price of gas goes down. We rejected several moving quotes this year because they were still charging the fees even though the price of gas had dropped over a buck.
Baggage charges for the airlines appear to be reasonable because of the handling of the baggage. Plus, they often get charged to vacation travelers who are not high value, loyal customers of the airlines. Me? I never check luggage. Even if I did, it would probably be on American and they waive the fee for their loyal customers. That’s effective use of fees.
I have started flying a lot on Northwest (Now part of Delta) because they are the only direct flight to a new client. Northwest has a fee of $20 for a better seat–a lot like Jet Blue. On a recent flight, I noticed that they only had one regular seat for no extra fee–it was way in the back of the bus and a middle seat. So, I paid the fee for an aisle seat up front–it was worth it because the aircraft was packed. If it hadn’t been packed, meaning that the airline was not showing available cheaper but still better seats, I would have switched to American and taken the hop through Chicago. Not the case here and I felt the fee was fair. We had to change flights and had to pay a $50 change fee–again. Fair? Yes, but I’m feeling a little nickel and dimed by these guys. If the fees continue, I’ll probably say the heck with it and start doing the indirect on American–do you get the picture here? Even though we have a client paying the charges, I’ll still switch because I don’t think it’s fair!
Southwest has begun charging a $10 fee for those people who want to get to the front of the line. For business people, it means a front row seat, a guaranteed place for the luggage and first off at landing–not a bad deal. That’s a well chosen fee for a target market of people who will be willing to pay the fee and think it’s fair. I do wonder what the impact will be on people who are the casual traveler–will they get angry when people pay to cut to the front of the line? It should be interesting.
The bottom line is that fees are an important consideration for companies that are looking for ways to increase profits and charge for special services. Whether to a general population or to specific segments, when those fees are viewed as fair—they can be effective ways to call out the special features and services that customers can receive if they want to pay. When fees are viewed as unfair by an increasing percentage of the population, however, they can cause increased switching and a declining population of loyal customers–something that has to be monitored over time. Yes it is tricky but if properly managed, fair fees work and can be a significant boost for profits.
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .
7 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Rags Srinivasan | September 16, 2009 at 4:11 am
Customer perception of these unbundled pricing is greatly influenced by their reference price. Reference price, as you might already know, is framed by what the customer is used to paying for a product/service based on past purchase instances and/or other available alternatives (Moon, Russel, Duvvari 2005 Journal of Retailing)
Customers perceive the extra charges as unfair or unreasonable when it exceeds their reference price. Most of the efforts to unbundle pricing fail (like USAir charging for soft-drinks) because of the failure to manage reference price. Customers never paid for baggage or account maintenance fees hence their reference price is $0. So any attempt to charge will be perceived as unreasonable.
Fortunately reference price is malleable (Thomas and Menon Journal of Mkt Research, 2006). My team and I did a consumer behavior experiment on customer acceptance of charging for extras and found statistically significant improvement on customer acceptance of extras when the market first improves reference price.
http://www.slideshare.net/ragsvasan/publicviewreferenceprice
2.
Holden Advisors | September 16, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Hi Rags: I agree–but it’s more than just the referrence price–it’s what we called The Fairness Effect in The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing–a customers perception that whatever is being charged is fair. Like referrence price, perceptions of fairness can be influence by positioning PR (aka, Constituent Communications) and images wraped around the actually consumption. BTW, nice job on your own blog.
reed
3.
Rags Srinivasan | September 17, 2009 at 1:45 am
Hi Reed
Is reference price the summary representation of fairness effect? In other words is the price that is considered fair the reference price? In our experiment on reference price effect, we did not try to address fairness, we simply offered them two options that resulted in increase in acceptance of extra charges.
On the other hand we did not do an experiment where we addressed fairness effect by stating the cost incurred in providing the extras just to make it acceptable to the customer.
Thanks for your kind note on the blog. The book Strategy and Tactics of Pricing and Prof Teck Ho are my inspirations.
-rags
4.
Tony Brown | September 24, 2009 at 12:19 pm
I don’t know If I said it already but …Hey good stuff…keep up the good work!
I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,)
A definite great read..Tony Brown
5.
Mike Lawson | October 14, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Reed – hope all is well and I’ve been thinking about fees quite a bit recently as we have recently implemented fees for some of our business units.
What has me thinking is the airline fees and specifically baggage fees that have been added. Any pricing professional knows that airlines have big revenue management departments which analyze h millions of pieces of data to optimize both revenue and profitability. However, I wonder if they blew it with baggage fees…
If the customer mix changed from more business travelers who are less price sensitive given the shared cost effect to leisure travelers who are incredibly price sensitive, then the fees make sense – capture additional revenue/profits from customers that are using/value the service. However, we both know that business travelers typically do not check luggage and that they typically would not balk at a ticket price that was $40 higher. So the burden falls to leisure travelers. (I morally agree business travelers should not subsidize the costs of leisure travelers, but that is not the issue here as airlines never cared about equality before and profit optimization is the goal)
So the question is this…who did it reward and what is the true impact of the checked baggage? It would seem that business travelers (who are less price sensitive) won with lower fares while the leisure traveler lost with a higher “overall fare” due to checked baggage fees. Without knowing the numbers, I would guess that the sales dollars lost from decreased fares for business travelers summed with the baggage fees for leisure travelers is probably close to break-even. And in the process we have trained both our “higher value” business customers and price buying leisure travelers to to carry on luggage and always expect lower fares. Sure, an exception would be if lower prices/baggage fees did increase the demand of leisure travelers but I don’ think that is the case.
Would a better solution have been to designate baggage fees on flights that have a higher percentage of leisure travelers or extended stay business travelers while keeping fares aritificially higher on highly traveled business routes? Sure, the fairness effect comes into play, but again when did airlines care about fairness?
Mike
6.
Holden Advisors | October 19, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Hi Mike: Great series of questions. We’ve been doing some research on this and, believe it or not, the research is inconclusive on the real impact of fees on customers. Yet, airlines saw over $10B in profits in 2008 and banks saw over $30B in 2009 (and the year isn’t done yet!).
Specific to the airlines, they are charging fees to their least loyal customers and it works. Your idea to identify baggage full airlines might work eventually but those guys are still balancing their yield management models for the recession.
To other businesses, I don’t think we make enough use of fees and, if we do, we negotiate them away too fast and easy. Go figure.
Hope all is well, Best to Nicole.
7.
Holden Advisors | September 24, 2009 at 10:00 am
Rags: In the first case, you are assessing willingness to pay. In the second case, you would be adjusting willingness to pay by giving the respondent a price frame to make them think that whatever price you are charging or, in this case, testing, is “fair”. Referrence effects can be existing or adjusted as can fairness effects. Referrence is more of a comparison where fairness is the resulting attitude from a variety of inputs. Hope that helps.
reed